It's one thing to have redundant extensions, it's another to have three
different extensions (two of which have names differing by one letter) that
are exactly the same thing, as in line-for-line they do the same exact
thing.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerromeo(a)gmail.com
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 1:20 AM, Matthew Flaschen <mflaschen(a)wikimedia.org>wrote;wrote:
On 02/07/2013 01:17 AM, Tyler Romeo wrote:
Yes, but we don't have to keep all three
extension pages. As the
MediaWiki
community, don't we want to make things
simpler for sysadmins? We can't
force them to work together, but I don't see how keeping all three
extensions on
MW.org is useful.
I don't know if there's precedent for evicting extensions from
MW.org.
There are already warnings about two for storing code on the wiki.
Arguably, it's useful to have a complete directory, so people can search
and have stuff categorized, even though some are redundant and/or low
quality.
Matt
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l