Hello,
I'm trying to create an extension which has a tooltip to show information.
To show the tooltip, I need an "onMouseOver" to call the
javaScript-Function. But when I try my hook to return a string like
"<a onMouseOver='...'>Hello World!</a>" this string is escaped like "<a
onMouseOver ... </a>". What can I do??? If I try to use a <span>-Tag,
the "onMouseOver"-Attribute is not shown (Why this???)
Please tell me how to handle this.
Best regards,
Kai Huener
An automated run of parserTests.php showed the following failures:
Running test BUG 361: URL within URL, not bracketed... FAILED!
Running test External links: invalid character... FAILED!
Running test Bug 2702: Mismatched <i> and <a> tags are invalid... FAILED!
Running test A table with no data.... FAILED!
Running test A table with nothing but a caption... FAILED!
Running test Link containing "#<" and "#>" % as a hex sequences... FAILED!
Running test Magic links: PMID incorrectly converts space to underscore... FAILED!
Running test Template with thumb image (wiht link in description)... FAILED!
Running test Link to image page... FAILED!
Running test BUG 1887: A ISBN with a thumbnail... FAILED!
Running test BUG 1887: A <math> with a thumbnail... FAILED!
Running test BUG 561: {{/Subpage}}... FAILED!
Running test Simple category... FAILED!
Running test Section headings with TOC... FAILED!
Running test Media link with nasty text... FAILED!
Running test Bug 2095: link with pipe and three closing brackets... FAILED!
Running test Sanitizer: Validating the contents of the id attribute (bug 4515)... FAILED!
Passed 268 of 285 tests (94.04%) FAILED!
I've gone ahead and enabled the semi-protection level for all of our wikis.
A total of 16 had already explicitly requested it over the last couple months,
and I haven't heard from any site asking to keep the option on.
Unless it's actually used by the admins on a given site, there's no change in
behavior; it's just a middle-level option now available between unprotected and
sysops-only.
-- brion vibber (brion @ pobox.com)
Hi.
I've just downloaded a style from 'wikimedia.org'
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Gallery_of_user_styles#FraternalRelief
and I'm not able to see it with IExplorer (it works ok with Firefox).
This style includes some files called 'IE50Fixes.css',
'IE55Fixes.css', but I've got
no clue about what to do with them.
Any tip? Thank you very much.
Hello,
I'm a software and information systems engineer, and I'm from Syria.
I'm really impressed by the huge work you are doing in Wikipedia, and I'd
like to contribute with you.
What I'm offering is to translate as many articles as I can per week into
arabic, especially those information technology related.
Besides I can do some programming or even documentation if you want some
help in those sections
And if you have any other ideas, please let me know.
Hope to hear from you soon.
Rula Sayaf.
As with Multilingual MediaWiki, Gerard and I may have funding for this
project, so I'd appreciate some feedback on the draft specs here:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/InstantCommons
The idea is to make Commons content easily available to any MediaWiki
installation. The main questions I'd appreciate comments on:
1) The best method to transparently download content in the background
that can easily be implemented in PHP without (too many) dependencies.
2) What other scalability issues beyond the ones discussed in the specs
there may be.
3) How thumbnail-generation of images where no client-side conversion
capabilities exist should be managed (notably SVG).
4) Whether Media: links should be handled in the way described or
differently.
Regards,
Erik
An automated run of parserTests.php showed the following failures:
Running test BUG 361: URL within URL, not bracketed... FAILED!
Running test External links: invalid character... FAILED!
Running test Bug 2702: Mismatched <i> and <a> tags are invalid... FAILED!
Running test A table with no data.... FAILED!
Running test A table with nothing but a caption... FAILED!
Running test Link containing "#<" and "#>" % as a hex sequences... FAILED!
Running test Magic links: PMID incorrectly converts space to underscore... FAILED!
Running test Template with thumb image (wiht link in description)... FAILED!
Running test Link to image page... FAILED!
Running test BUG 1887: A ISBN with a thumbnail... FAILED!
Running test BUG 1887: A <math> with a thumbnail... FAILED!
Running test BUG 561: {{/Subpage}}... FAILED!
Running test Simple category... FAILED!
Running test Section headings with TOC... FAILED!
Running test Media link with nasty text... FAILED!
Running test Bug 2095: link with pipe and three closing brackets... FAILED!
Running test Sanitizer: Validating the contents of the id attribute (bug 4515)... FAILED!
Passed 264 of 281 tests (93.95%) FAILED!
I've changed how the Special:Undelete view works a little bit. The last deleted
page text is no longer displayed above the revisions list; it tended to be
rather annoying for big pages and could make things hard to deal with if the
page had hostile CSS (eg obscuring the buttons).
The revisions also now display the wiki source code by default, making it easier
to examine the code of a deleted page or copy-and-paste if necessary. Rendered
preview from there is optional.
Please copy this notification to whereever your wiki's curious sysops may be
hanging out.
-- brion vibber (brion @ pobox.com)
I would like to be able to specify whether redirected links and
inclusion-type links are included on the list.
How difficult would it be to add the capability to WhatLinksHere?
e.g. if I wanted only direct links, I would add ...&redirect=no
If I wanted only template inclusions, I would add ...&inclusion=yes
OTOH if I wanted everything *but* template inclusions, I would add
...&inclusion=no
HTH HAND
--
Phil
[[en:User:Phil Boswell]]
How difficult would it be to change the way that namespaces were handled so
that you could assign particular namespaces to particular formats?
What I mean is, would it be possible to arrange that you could, for example,
set up a namespace for "SVG" images. When you viewed the pages in that
namespace, you saw an image; when you edited the page, you got the SVG code.
You would then have to put the "description" on the talk page but that would
be OK surely.
I was particulary thinking of this in connection with the various extensions
at Wikisophia (http://wikisophia.org/wiki/Main_Page) many of which would
actually work better as namespaces. It would also work for EasyTimeline.
I was envisaging also changing the way linking and transcluding worked. All
links using [[.]] would be just links. All transcluding, including of
images, would be via {{.}}. Obviously this change is reasonably orthogonal
to the other.
One thing that might work better however is that you could then pass
parameters into a transclusion, which isn't the case at the moment, because
the order of proceessing precludes it.
--
Phil
[[en:User:Phil Boswell]]