It seems $wgValidSpecialPages and the function that returns it,
getValidSpecialPages(), don't do anything anymore. This email is sent
to confirm that this is really true so that i can subsequently send in
a patch that removes it from the various language files.
I've looked around the site and through the archives, but I have not
found how you can change the license message from within WikiMedia.
What I am looking to do, is remove the GFDL text that appears in the
bottom of my Wiki, and replace it with a notice indicating that the
material (documents) is property of my employer. If anyone could point
me to some documentation on how to do this, that would be much
appreciated. Thanks in advance!
Wes
I knew that you cannot block an admin because he can simply unblock himself.
There were some experiments on it.wiki (have a look to http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciale:Log/block), but I cannot understand if there's a problem or is the right behaviour.
Svante and Archenzo are both admins.
Svante blocked Archenzo:
22:12, Feb 28, 2005 Svante bloccato "Utente:Archenzo" per un periodo di 2 hours (perchè ha votato per Berlusconi nelle elezioni politiche del '94, nel '96 e pure nel 2001)
Then Archenzo try to unblock himself, but he cannot succeed. Everytime he unblocked himself automatically began a new block on #xxx:
22:23, Feb 28, 2005 Archenzo sbloccato "Utente:Archenzo" (test di autosblocco)
22:22, Feb 28, 2005 Archenzo sbloccato "Utente:Archenzo" (test di autosblocco)
22:21, Feb 28, 2005 Archenzo sbloccato "Utente:#193" (test di autosblocco)
22:21, Feb 28, 2005 Archenzo sbloccato "Utente:#192" (test di autosblocco)
22:20, Feb 28, 2005 Archenzo sbloccato "Utente:Archenzo" (test di autosblocco)
22:18, Feb 28, 2005 Archenzo sbloccato "Utente:Utente:Archenzo" (test di autosblocco)
Only another admin (in this case, the same Svante) succeded in unblocking him:
22:48, Feb 28, 2005 Svante sbloccato "Utente:#195" (fine test)
22:47, Feb 28, 2005 Svante sbloccato "Utente:#194" (fine test)
22:47, Feb 28, 2005 Svante sbloccato "Utente:#199" (fine test)
22:45, Feb 28, 2005 Svante sbloccato "Utente:#198" (fine test)
22:44, Feb 28, 2005 Svante sbloccato "Utente:#197" (fine test)
22:43, Feb 28, 2005 Svante sbloccato "Utente:#196" (fine test)
22:40, Feb 28, 2005 Svante sbloccato "Utente:#200" (fine test)
But if Archenzo does everything alone (both blockin and unblocking himself), everything works:
19:14, Feb 25, 2005 Archenzo sbloccato "Utente:#186" (prova tecnica)
19:13, Feb 25, 2005 Archenzo sbloccato "Utente:Archenzo" (prova tecnica)
19:11, Feb 25, 2005 Archenzo bloccato "Utente:Archenzo" per un periodo di 1 hours (prova di autoblocco)
Does everything work in the right way?
Thanks.
Frieda
Elfrida Brioschi
Laser - Informatica e Servizi
Tel. 02 4143 2053 - 328 0731320
Wikipedia/WikiCommons/Wikibooks are all dangerously slow. I recently installed
the Zend Optimiser 2.5.7 on my site www.wikinerds.org . Zend Optimiser speeds
up php by 40%. I think you should install it too if you haven't done so
already.
--
NSK
http://portal.wikinerds.org
Why is deletion of images permanent ?
Is there a good reason it is so while articles may be restored ?
While images deletion is permanent, it really tips the balance in favor
of deletionists, I do not think it is fair. If there is no possibility
to retrieve a deleted pictures, deletion should possibly not be as easy
than just clicking on delete.
Is there a solution other than retrieving lost images on our mirrors ?
Anthere