Right, if I wrote an article on en: that said "a popular singer", it would be expanded? Am I supposed to believe that? If I made articles like that on en.wikipedia, I'd probably be asked to stop, and perhaps even banned. An article containing two words is by no measure a stub, unless it is a language where those two words translate into an English sentence. I would hardly call my actions "spamming this list with defensive flames". I believe I have the right to defend myself against accusations, so even if they are "defensive flames" I believe I am entitled to that. I have sent perhaps 10 "defensive flames" as you call them over the course of 3 days. That may be a little bit much, but given what is going on, I think it should be expected from anybody. In addition, the only other minority language Wikipedia I've been accused of causing problems at is ks.wikipedia. Toki Pona is not a minority language in the usual meaning of the word. If you check my edits on all minority language Wikipedias, I guarantee you there is nothing against policy. I also guarantee you that any edits made before this moment by "node_ue" on any Wikipedia are mine. In fact, the majority of these edits are reversions of vandalism, notes on talkpages, uploads of logos, or other minor helpful edits. Danny cannot reasonably claim to speak for the userbase of the Yddish Wikipedia, given that the one user other than him and I has worked out all outstanding issues on the Yiddish Wikipedia. As noted before, if I continued to revert the pages to my speedy-template versions, that could be considered on all accounts "bad", however when I realised such edits - of which I made 4, I repeat 4, that's f o u r four - were upsetting Danny, I didn't make any more. In fact, I didn't make any more before he got upset, either, even though I had plenty of time. Danny is the only one whining about this. Four. That's one, two, three four pages, totaling 19 words. If you subtract "a", "is", and "of" (in Yiddish of course), that is 19 words. To deal with these pages separately, that would be 5 words on two pages (America and Britney Spears), 3 subtracting "a"s. The other two pages total 14 words, 6 subtracting "a", "is", and "of". These two pages said exclusively "_____ is a brother of ___" and linked to one another. It's not as if I went on some massive spree of replacing pages with {{delete}} notices, as a matter of fact yi.wikipedia doesn't yet even have enough pages for a "spree". Nor did I ignore people when they confronted me. In fact, Jamesday confronted me and we came to an understanding that not only had I already stopped, I wasn't planning on doing it anymore. Danny didn't even bother to confront me. And all of this hubbub took place nearly 24 hours after these edits, about 7 hours after they were reverted. Claims against me are getting to such a level where they are so rediculous I would laugh if they were made against somebody else. 4 pages which would have been speedied on en.wikipedia or any other Wikipedia, not engaging in a revert war, and all the action taking place well after the actual "problem"? That's crazy. Mark On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 22:58:17 +1000, Craig Franklin <craig(a)halo-17.net> wrote: