Well, let's see, Editing Saddam Hussein was from a Qwest IP from the
same city your edits originate from. The username was associated with
Red Faction, as you are. It was used in a window of time in which you
were using Wikipedia, as you nominated User:Plato at about the same
time. And, furthermore, Comrade Nick has said that you were Editing
Saddam Hussein.
I'm pretty well convinced by that chain of evidence. I suppose if you
wanted to prove otherwise you could ask a developer to check the IP
addresses to see if they match up exactly - I only know they're the
same ISP and region.
But I'm not going to ask a developer to do that, because, honestly, I'm
already convinced.
-Snowspinner
On Jun 28, 2004, at 1:37 PM, moink wrote:
*Surely,
Plato's say-so is not sufficent grounds to ban me; I'm
rather confused as
to how
he can "admit" to my alleged crimes. Regardless, having reviewed the
history of User:Editing Saddam Hussein -- I am at a loss as to how
that account envokes the negative connotations indicated in the latter
half of "A sock puppet is an additional username used by a Wikipedian
who posts under more than one name. While they may serve legitimate
purposes, sock puppets may
be sometimes also used to deceive, for example by voting more than
once in a poll or otherwise creating an illusion of broader support
for an idea." *Apparently you feel that the account was used to
sockpuppet against your admin request -- do you have any proof of my
voting more than once in RfA? I doubt you will find any evidence to
support your allegation; since, I am not User:Editing Saddam Hussein
nor is that my sockpuppet.
I do have to wonder how a user can "admit to" anything on another's
behalf.
moink
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l