With this discussion I've noticed that at Wikinews in Spanish we have
GFDL instead of public domain. Maybe we'll wait for the conclusion of
this proposal before changing the licence. Ascander.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 5/2/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Brandon Stafford</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:brandon.stafford@gmail.com">brandon.stafford@gmail.com
</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Like Amgine, and most or all of the other Wikinews enthusiasts I've
spoken with, I'm eager to see Wikinews under a CC-BY license. (I would
prefer public domain if I didn't trust Larry Lessig's opinion on legal
matters a billion times more than my own.)<br>
<br>
Regarding the CC-WIKI license, has the Share-Alike clause been
addressed? The most recent draft of CC-WIKI
(<a href="http://creativecommons.org/drafts/wiki_0.5" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">http://creativecommons.org/drafts/wiki_0.5</a>) includes a Share-Alike
clause that I don't think we want, although I personally wouldn't mind
it.<br>
<br>
I'm also fine with the migration clause, by the way, though I would
like to hear a confirmation of Robin Shannon's understanding: <br>
<pre>&quot;If I understand correctly, the material would still be licensed CC-BY so Wikimedia could not declare it All Rights Reserved&quot;</pre>
Back to &quot;ferreting out false postings,&quot;<br>
Brandon, who has briefly escaped the sweeping pings that normally plague him.<br>

<br>_______________________________________________<br>Wikinews-l mailing list<br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:Wikinews-l@Wikimedia.org">Wikinews-l@Wikimedia.org</a><br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l" target="_blank">
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l</a><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>