Sorry - I meant Dan!
And thanks for the clarification James (those metrics make sense)
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:44 AM, James Hare <james.hare(a)wikidc.org
(mailto:james.hare@wikidc.org)> wrote:
(Who’s Kevin?)
For Rolling Active Editor, I decided to chunk it into month-long periods. So I am trying
the first one for 30 days prior to June 1, 2014. Yet that report nonetheless failed.
The report for newly registered worked out just fine.
—
James Hare
President, Wikimedia DC
http://wikimediadc.org
@wikimediadc
On Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Edward Galvez wrote:
>
> Hi James and Kevin,
>
> Here are the global metrics specifications for newly registered and active editors
involved for wmf grantees. James, please let us know if you are looking for other metrics
or if these are what you need. I ask because the metrics you are specifying sound
different.
>
>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Learning_patterns/Number_of_newly_re…
>
>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Learning_patterns/Number_of_active_e…
>
> Thanks!
> Edward
>
>
>
> On Mar 19, 2015, at 9:42 AM, James Hare <james.hare(a)wikidc.org
(mailto:james.hare@wikidc.org)> wrote:
>
> > Rolling new active editor may not be the metric I need. Just, for that period
of time, I need to know which of the editors were active editors (5+ edits/month) and
which had created their accounts in that period.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > James
> >
> > —
> > James Hare
> > President, Wikimedia DC
> >
http://wikimediadc.org
> > @wikimediadc
> >
> >
> > On Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Dan Andreescu wrote:
> >
> > > James,
> > >
> > > I'm cc-ing Jonathan as this issue looks to have two components.
> > >
> > > First, James, I ran the Edits metric on your cohort and it worked ok. I
am running the Rolling New Active Editor metric and it seems a bit slow, so we're
looking into that.
> > >
> > > Second, how exactly are these reports run? Like, are you using Rolling
New Active Editor and doing it in chunks of 30 days over the period you need? Could you
detail this, as these rolling metrics are very slow and were not really meant for this
kind of use. We can adjust our system accordingly (maybe we can make faster metrics that
get to what you need better).
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:04 PM, James Hare <james.hare(a)wikidc.org
(mailto:james.hare@wikidc.org)> wrote:
> > > > I want to know, for a period from July 1 to September 30, which of
the ~1,300 contributors are new, and which are active editors, per the global metrics
meanings of those terms. Let me know fi you need a list of usernames from me.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > James
> > > >
> > > > —
> > > > James Hare
> > > > President, Wikimedia DC
> > > >
http://wikimediadc.org
> > > > @wikimediadc
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Nuria Ruiz wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > James,
> > > > >
> > > > > There are probably better metrics for your purposes, could you
let us know what data are you interested on? Once we know that we can take a look to see
if there are any issues with the tool itself.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Nuria
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:47 PM, James Hare
<james.hare(a)wikidc.org (mailto:james.hare@wikidc.org)> wrote:
> > > > > > I am trying to run a report measuring rolling active editor
and newly registered for a cohort of about ~20,000 accounts (actually only about ~1,300
Commons usernames, but I opted to have it extended to their global accounts in case they
also did stuff outside of Commons). I have now tried to run the report twice and it has
failed. Anyone know what is going on?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > James
> > > > > >
> > > > > > —
> > > > > > James Hare
> > > > > > President, Wikimedia DC
> > > > > >
http://wikimediadc.org
> > > > > > @wikimediadc
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Wikimetrics mailing list
> > > > > > Wikimetrics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
(mailto:Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org)
> > > > > >
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Wikimetrics mailing list
> > > > > Wikimetrics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
(mailto:Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org)
> > > > >
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikimetrics mailing list
> > > > Wikimetrics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
(mailto:Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org)
> > > >
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimetrics mailing list
> > > Wikimetrics(a)lists.wikimedia.org (mailto:Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org)
> > >
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimetrics mailing list
> > Wikimetrics(a)lists.wikimedia.org (mailto:Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org)
> >
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimetrics mailing list
> Wikimetrics(a)lists.wikimedia.org (mailto:Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org)
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimetrics mailing list
Wikimetrics(a)lists.wikimedia.org (mailto:Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org)
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics
--
Edward Galvez
Program Evaluation Associate
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Wikimetrics mailing list
Wikimetrics(a)lists.wikimedia.org (mailto:Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org)