Not from me, if that is what you are implying. I have not been in touch with either publication. As for the Signpost piece, it is a fair summary of what they wrote, which is the Signpost's job to deliver.

Andreas

On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 9:01 PM, David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9 February 2013 20:56, Andy Mabbett <andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
> On 9 February 2013 13:08, Thehelpfulone <thehelpfulonewiki@gmail.com> wrote:

>> http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/governance/news/content/14428/wikimedia_uk_trustees_have_been_too_involved_to_govern_the_charity

> This also refers to an "an intellectual property dispute over
> QRPedia", which is, of course, bunkum.


Oh, look who else quotes this claim:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2013-02-11/In_the_media

I wonder where they got it from.


- d.

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org