> Tom Holden:
> > Seems a little excessive. This election was never expected to be perfect.
>
> i agree. while i think an election overseen by a third-party could make sense
> for a 'real' board, this initial election accords no special privilege to the
> people who are elected. i'd rather see it be over quickly and the new board
> move on to doing real work.
>
> - river.

What method of voting are we going to use, how are we going to collect the results. It has been
discussed on IRC to hold a secret ballot to avoid vote stacking, so if that is the case, we need to
create a method that is *secret* and we need to be able to ensure it is fair. Whether or nor we
assume good faith in those running for this election, i do not think it is professional for those running
for the board to be overseeing this election. Now how this is avoided is down to what we can agree on
this list, but i do not think that my concerns are unfounded. There is little reason to stick to the
current timetable as much as possible, but there are other issues to be dealt with.

---

Try Facebook in Windows Live Messenger! Try it Now!