cool article, summary/introduction too long. summary should be made short and concise. i can't figure out why refs are starting numbering at 6 in the summary section. I will give it a few minutes..

[[user_talk:Ecoman24]], formerly [[user:fngosa]]


--- On Wed, 10/14/09, u7z44@students.keele.ac.uk <u7z44@students.keele.ac.uk> wrote:

From: u7z44@students.keele.ac.uk <u7z44@students.keele.ac.uk>
Subject: [Wikimediauk-l] A request for assistance.
To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2009, 3:36 AM

Hey everyone,
   I realise this probably isn't the proper place to ask, but I'm in need
of some assistance. I've been working on [[International Space
Station]] for about three years now, and it's really close to finally
being able to pass FAC. Unfortunately, it needs a good strong copyedit
to "make it say what it means and mean what it says", and I'm so
indoctrinated by the prose I can't do a good job.. Requests to the
overworked Guild of Copyeditors haven't worked, so I was wondering if
one of the wonderful WMUK folks fancies taking a look at it and boldly
sorting out my geeky prose? :-)

James Humphreys (Colds7ream)


_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org