hi martin,

i really appreciate this structured approach. why are you not using
zentralbibliothek zürich:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Zentralbibliothek_Z%C3%BCrich
as an example? they did not invent anything new and used the proven
way of uploading. no additional license text, no additional website.
highest quality. unrestricted. no links to pay walls.

rupert
swissGLAMour


On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Martin Poulter <infobomb@gmail.com> wrote:
> Forwarded in case it is of interest
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Cable Green <cable@creativecommons.org>
> Date: 19 August 2013 18:29
> Subject: OpenGLAM Principles, 3rd iteration
> To: OER-DISCUSS@jiscmail.ac.uk
>
>
> FYI
>
> Cable
>
>
> http://openglam.org/principles/
>
>
> -----------------------
>
> OpenGLAM Principles
>
> v.0.6.
>
> Note: This is the third version of the OpenGLAM principles which we have
> drafted together with the OpenGLAM Working Group. We would like this to be a
> community effort so please give feedback on the OpenGLAM mailing list!
>
> Galleries, libraries, archives and museums have a fundamental role in
> supporting the advance of humanity’s knowledge. They are the custodians of
> our cultural heritage and in their collections they hold the record of
> humankind.
>
> The internet affords cultural heritage institutions a radical new
> opportunity to engage global audiences and make their collections more
> discoverable and connected than ever, allowing users not only to enjoy the
> riches of the world’s memory institutions, but also to contribute,
> participate and share.
>
> We believe that cultural institutions that take steps to open up their
> collections and metadata stand to benefit from these opportunities.
>
> When we say that a collection or data set is “open” we mean that it is
> complies with the Open Definition, which can be summed up in the statement
> that:
>
> “A piece of data or content is open if anyone is free to use, reuse, and
> redistribute it — subject only, at most, to the requirement to give credit
> to the author and/or making any resulting work available under the same
> terms as the original work.”
>
> The first step to make a collection open is to apply an open license, but
> that is where the story begins. Openness to collaboration and to novel forms
> of user engagement are essential if cultural heritage institutions are to
> realise the full potential of the internet for access, innovation and
> digital scholarship.
>
> ________________________________
>
> An OpenGLAM institution champions these principles:
>
> 1. Digital information about the works (metadata) should be released under
> the Creative Commons Zero Waiver.
>
> This promotes the maximum possible reuse of the data and allows your
> resources to become more discoverable whilst also ensuring compliance with
> major cultural data aggregators such as Europeana and the Digital Public
> Library of America.
>
> For exemplary open metadata licensing policies see:
>
> Europeana Licensing Framework
> Digital Public Library of America
>
> 2. Keep digital representations of works for which copyright has expired
> (public domain) in the public domain by not adding new rights to them.
>
> Digital representations of public domain works should be placed in the
> public domain via the use of the Public Domain Mark. This promotes the
> maximum possible reuse of the content.
>
> For exemplary open content licensing policies see:
>
> The Rijksmuseum
> The British Library
> The Walters Art Museum
>
> For more detailed documents and charters on the importance of the digital
> public domain see:
>
> Europeana Public Domain Charter
> Communia Public Domain Manifesto
>
> 3. When publishing data make an explicit and robust statement of your wishes
> and expectations with respect to reuse and repurposing of the descriptions,
> the whole data collection, and subsets of the collection.
>
> For exemplary statements see:
>
> The Rijksmuseum
> The British Library
> The Walters Art Museum
>
> 4. When publishing data use open file formats which are machine-readable.
>
> Formats that are machine readable are ones which are able to have their data
> extracted by computer programs.
> If information is released in a closed file format, this can cause
> significant obstacles to reusing the information encoded in it, forcing
> those who wish to use the information to buy the necessary software.
> The structure and possible uses of the data should be well documented, for
> example in a datablog or webpage.
>
> For more information on open file formats, have a look at the Open Data
> Handbook.
>
> 5. Opportunities to engage audiences in novel ways on the web should be
> pursued.
>
> When publishing data, be willing to answer questions from interested parties
> about the data and support them in getting the most out of your data.
> Give opportunities for your audiences to curate and collect items from your
> collections. The Rijksmuseum’s Rijksstudio is a great example of this kind
> engagement.
> Where possible consider allowing your users to enrich and improve your
> metadata by leveraging crowdsourcing applications.
>
> - See more at: http://openglam.org/principles/#sthash.k3DIhQOC.dpuf
>
>
>
> --
> Dr Martin L Poulter
> Jisc Wikimedia Ambassador, July 2013 - March 2014
> Wikipedia contributor         http://enwp.org/User:MartinPoulter
> Volunteer, Wikimedia UK   http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:MartinPoulter
> Musician                          http://soundcloud.com/martin-poulter
>                                        http://myspace.com/comapilot
> Person                             http://infobomb.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org