In connection with the Credo subscriptions Erik Möller Deputy Director, Wikimedia Foundation created the mailing list Wikimediareference-l list run by erik at wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediareference-l It has a little bit of discussion from March to July, 2010. Let's all subscribe and bury this conversation away from public view so we won't have to think about it any more. I see they have a job description for a communications staff person to coordinate discussions. This is a good example of what some way of coordinating discussions is needed. One thought though, there should be some mechanism for the donor to get feedback on the use and usefulness of their donation by active and successful Wikipedia editors if they are going to be satisfied that their donation was useful and appreciated. Fred contacting benefit -- to them -- that increased citation of high-quality which meant editors who don't contribute content signed up for them, as did those who already have access at home through their local libraries -- though in fairness several withdrew their names once they realized that. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CREDO kind of donation, particularly from databases giving access to accounts went to editors who would use them the most, but who don't currently have access. This kind of thing would really improve article quality, and would make established editors feel their needs were being looked after.