Because this is how wiki links are rendered when
they are on the same
page.
For example, if you insert "[[Kerala]]" into the text somewhere in the
article on Kerala, the wiki link gets displayed as bold text instead.
:-P
2012/1/11 Ashwin Baindur <ashwin.baindur(a)gmail.com>
Quiz question - why do refs 2 & 3 show
Gandhi's name in bold in
"Citations" section (References or footnotes)?
Question may be answered by anyone. Lets see who gets it right first?
Warm regards,
Ashwin Baindur
------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Ashwin Baindur <
ashwin.baindur(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Karthik - ser 8 to end.
>
>
> Warm regards,
>
> Ashwin Baindur
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> 2012/1/11 Karthik Nadar <karthikndr(a)gmail.com>
>
>> Though I am already working in the article, you can donate me a
>> session to clean references.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks and Regards,
>> *Karthik Nadar.*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2012/1/11 Ashwin Baindur <ashwin.baindur(a)gmail.com>
>>
>>> ArnavChaudhary - 2 Civil rights movement in South Africa
(
1893–1914)<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohandas_Karamchand_Gandhi#Civil…
>>>
>>>
>>> Warm regards,
>>>
>>> Ashwin Baindur
>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Ashwin Baindur <
>>> ashwin.baindur(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Arnav Chaudhary <arnavchaudhary(a)gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:53 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: GA master class - Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi #2
>>>> To: Ashwin Baindur <ashwin.baindur(a)gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi, already started checking the article regarding
>>>> improvements(making list of supposed improvements which can be done) and
>>>> was supposed to start checking references after 3 hours.
>>>>
>>>> So didnt reply.
>>>>
>>>> Please provide a tasks and i will start in 3 hours from now.
>>>> Will share my list too in a day or two once i am back on my regular
>>>> Pc.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Arnav Chaudhary
>>>> +91-9049039013
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Ashwin Baindur <
>>>> ashwin.baindur(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Please post to the group but not to me. Yes, we shall go through
>>>>> every reference. Each & every source must be checked. You will be
surprised
>>>>> at what amount of s#%t is hidden amongst seemingly innocuous
references.
>>>>>
>>>>> Okay, each of you take a bunch of citations. I'll allot
>>>>> arbitrarily -
>>>>> * Rangilo - Refs in section - Principles, practices and beliefs
>>>>> * Debanjan - Refs in section - Struggle for Indian Independence.
>>>>> * Nick.me & Arnav C - no response from you guys on email list to
>>>>> date so can't task you. Sorry!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Warm regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Ashwin Baindur
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Debanjan Bandyopadhyay <
>>>>> debastein(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Question: Do we necessarily go through all the references and
see
>>>>>> if the text they are cited to is accurate or not? Or do we do
that for what
>>>>>> we feel are non-reliable sources.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Ashwin Baindur <
>>>>>> ashwin.baindur(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Correction, For "fart of GAs" read "raft of
GAs".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Warm regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ashwin Baindur
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Ashwin Baindur <
>>>>>>> ashwin.baindur(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In #1 we saw how to reconnoitre and plan for a campaign
to take
>>>>>>>> an article and make it GA. A few years ago this process
was easy but now
>>>>>>>> unconsciously standards have risen and a fart of GAs are
being
>>>>>>>> derecognised, one of the important reasons for which is
content and
>>>>>>>> referencing issues. Gandhi, despite having been a former
GA, will require
>>>>>>>> serious amount of work to be restored to that status.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Our article "Gandhi" requires a major rewrite
and is not the
>>>>>>>> most suitable action to plunge editors new to the review
process in.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rather than that, let us take up the issue of
Referencing,
>>>>>>>> which is part cleanup and partly related to content and
which can be
>>>>>>>> tackled without too much of our work being undone in the
rewrite.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Referencing involves a number of things.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. Each fact needing reference should either have a
>>>>>>>> reference or a {{cn}} tag placed.
>>>>>>>> 2. Each reference needs to be checked against
[[WP:RS]]
>>>>>>>> (reliable sources) and if necessary deleted or
replaced with better. If no
>>>>>>>> ref can be found a {{cn}} tag be placed. Ultimately
taged facts where
>>>>>>>> references could not be found need to be deleted.
>>>>>>>> 3. The content on the article pertaining to the
reference
>>>>>>>> needs to be checked -
>>>>>>>> 1. Material written in the article is actually in
the
>>>>>>>> cited reference.
>>>>>>>> 2. The material written in the article is an NPOV
>>>>>>>> representation of the cited material in the
reference.
>>>>>>>> 4. Each reference needs to be converted to a complete
cite
>>>>>>>> templated reference with adequate details available in
the reference.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Some preliminary reading is recommended and definitely
required
>>>>>>>> for newbies or those who have not read the page before:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - [[WP:REFBEGIN]]
>>>>>>>> - [[WP:CITE]]
>>>>>>>> - [[WP:RS]]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> After this, we need to learn about cite templates. These
are
>>>>>>>> fill in the blank forms for use. I keep them in a text
file and copy them
>>>>>>>> for use and fill in. Preformatted as references, they
are:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <ref name="">{{cite book |title= |last=
|first= |authorlink=
>>>>>>>> |coauthors= |year= |publisher= |location= |isbn= |page=
|pages= |url=
>>>>>>>> |accessdate=9 January 2012}}</ref>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <ref name="">{{cite web |url= |title=
|author= |date= |work=
>>>>>>>> |publisher= |accessdate=9 January 2012}}</ref>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <ref name="">{{cite journal |last1=
|first1= |last2= |first2=
>>>>>>>> |year= |title= |journal= |publisher= |volume= |issue=
|pages= |url= |doi=
>>>>>>>> |accessdate=9 January 2012}}</ref>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <ref name="">{{cite news |title= |author=
|url= |newspaper=
>>>>>>>> |date= |accessdate=9 January 2012}}</ref>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ideally look in Google Books for a citation especially
one with
>>>>>>>> preview/full view. Once found, the url of the Google Book
url can be loaded
>>>>>>>> into RefTag (
url:http://reftag.appspot.com/) & lo
& behold it
>>>>>>>> will create a preformatted citation for you. Its that
simple.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For example, if we wanted to act a fact on Gandhi's
>>>>>>>> assassination, to show culpability of Nehru and his
fellow politicians in
>>>>>>>> creating the circumstances leading to it, the follwing
would be a very good
>>>>>>>> link:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
http://books.google.co.in/books?id=30e_maQ2vYQC&pg=PA58&dq=gandhi%2…
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If I load this url into the Google Books URL box for
RefTag, I
>>>>>>>> get the following url:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
http://reftag.appspot.com/?book_url=http%3A%2F%2Fbooks.google.co.in%2Fbooks…
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> which gives me the following Wikicode for a citation:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <ref name="Markovits2006">{{cite
book|author=Claude
>>>>>>>> Markovits|title=Un-Gandhian Gandhi|url=
>>>>>>>>
http://books.google.com/books?id=30e_maQ2vYQC&pg=PA58|accessdate=10Janu… 2012|date=1
January 2006|publisher=Permanent
>>>>>>>> Black|isbn=978-81-7824-155-5|pages=58–}}</ref>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> which, when used in an article, will result in the
following
>>>>>>>> citation:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
*^<http://reftag.appspot.com/?book_url=http%3A%2F%2Fbooks.google.co.in%2Fbooks%3Fid%3D30e_maQ2vYQC%26pg%3DPA58%26dq%3Dgandhi%2527s%2Bassassination%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DX%26ei%3DhoIMT4bsLM6srAeUhuHKBA%26ved%3D0CFoQuwUwBw%23v%3Donepage%26q%3Dgandhi%2527s%2520assassination%26f%3Dfalse&dateformat=dmy#cite_ref-Markovits2006_0-0>
>>>>>>>> * Claude Markovits (1 January 2006). *Un-Gandhian
Gandhi*<http://books.google.com/books?id=30e_maQ2vYQC&pg=PA58>g=PA58>.
>>>>>>>> Permanent Black. pp. 58–.
ISBN<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Standard_Book_Number>
>>>>>>>>
978-81-7824-155-5<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-8…-5>.
>>>>>>>> Retrieved 10 January 2012.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> COMBINED TASK for us all - To check each citation
carefully and
>>>>>>>> expand it/delete it/correct it as required.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Warm regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ashwin Baindur
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Debanjan*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Lets make this world a better and more informative place*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia-in-en mailing list
>>> Wikimedia-in-en(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-in-en
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-in-en mailing list
>> Wikimedia-in-en(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-in-en
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-in-en mailing list
Wikimedia-in-en(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-in-en
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-in-en mailing list
Wikimedia-in-en(a)lists.wikimedia.org