> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Casey Brown <
lists@caseybrown.org> wrote:
>>
>> 2011/5/26 N Michael Bashour <
nicholasbashour@gmail.com>:
>> > Attached are two PNG versions of the proposed logo. They're not meant
>> > to be separate logos, just two versions of the same one, where the use
>> > of either would depend on the context. One version has the text of the
>> > name, designed for situations where the text would be large enough to
>> > read (i.e. banners, posters, large promotional materials, etc.). The
>> > non-text version is for use in social media, postcards, notepads etc.,
>> > where the text otherwise would be too small to read. Let me know if
>> > you have any questions, comments or suggetions
>>
>>
>> As far as I know, all Wikimedia chapters use the same basic logo.
>> (Basically, the Wikimedia Foundation logo
>> <
http://wikimediafoundation.org> with "PLACE" instead of
>> "FOUNDATION".)
>>
>> I don't know if you guys really want to be spending energy coming up
>> with a new logo if you won't actually be able to use it as a formal
>> chapter. If you guys were just planning on using this until you were
>> an official chapter, then never mind. :-)
>
> That's the primary intent, since it's unclear when we might be recognized as
> a chapter.
> (There could be, I suppose, circumstances in which a chapter might need to
> use a non-Wikimedia logo -- it really depends on how the phrase "related
> activities" in the chapter agreement is interpreted -- but that's a
> theoretical subtlety that may be of limited practical applicability.)
> Kirill