I share Andrew's opinion. Let's do a category and later if needed we Can add a category with a bot. 

Regarding the name, i would follow 2011 & 2012 style:
 [[Category:WWI related images from Wiki loves Monuments 2013]]

Or something similar :)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Art_nouveau_images_from_Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2011
Sent from my Casiotone

El 27/08/2013, a les 22:21, Andrew Gray <andrew.gray@dunelm.org.uk> va escriure:
If we have a category, it should be relatively easy for a bot to automatically tag all members of that category with a template. So we could have the best of both worlds :-)

A.


On 27 August 2013 21:22, Platonides <platonides@gmail.com> wrote:
On 27/08/13 21:49, Lodewijk wrote:
There will be a special category - not a template. I believe people can
add categories already in the upload form, so this option is there
already. Categories are easier to add en masse (catalot etc) to images
in (cross sections of) categories, so I think that would be more practical.

I'm discussing with Alex what would be the best name for the category.
We probably want it to be as short, but clear, as possible?

Lodewijk

I personally favor a template, as it can not only add it to a category but also show  “This is related to the because {{{1}}}” with an icon, and is very clear for new users. But I don't oppose to a category either. I just request that such category is explicitely listed on the page (ie. no category removal because it is already in a subcategory. That would create a complication for the image lists).



--
- Andrew Gray
  andrew.gray@dunelm.org.uk
_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org