Hello everyone,

My impression of the discussion we had about monetary compensation to editors was a support for it, but even more so for having it not directly to editors-in-chiefs and EiC assistants, but rather to technical assistants, similarly to what was proposed in the earlier "hired editor?" conversation (as a follow-up of that, I haven't gotten any reply from Publons about how much their Reviewer Connect service would cost).

I think the most appropriate way to go is to hire a "technical editor" primarily among ourselves (boards and associate editors), but I think we should simultaneously look at MediaWiki-experienced freelancers such as at upwork.com. It will also be much easier to administer the compensation of one person (at least initially) than for multiple editor-in-chiefs and editors. I'm also thinking that person will begin editing with a limited budget, and the result will be evaluated to make a decision of whether to proceed in the same manner. Anyways, we should get the funding before making any decision about which particular person to hire, and I've made a draft of next budget grant application, including $1,500 for this purpose: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Project/Rapid/WikiJournal_2019

I chose to make it a "rapid grant", because the Simple Annual Plan grants program are currently not accepting new applications, and the next Project Grant application will not give us the grant soon enough for next year. We can continue with rapid grants as long as the budget is under $2,000, and we can theoretically apply multiple times per year even. Still, if the budget grows we may want to switch to a Project Grant instead. 

Best regards,

Mikael

On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:08 AM, Ian Alexander <iany@scenarioplus.org.uk> wrote:
Thomas

If we call them 'Technical Assistants (to the Board)' then we can still
say that the Board is all-volunteer.

Ian


On Mon, August 13, 2018 3:38 am, Thomas Shafee wrote:
> I think that here is minimal harm in a small compensation to the
> positions who do additional off-wiki work. The main risk is that it
> de-motivates volunteers if they feel that they are doing the same work
> that others are paid for.
>
> Hence it would be important to clearly define what any paid work is, and
> that it is to reduce workload on others.
>
> The official duties of the EiC are well defined, with additional
> responsibilities for e.g. paperwork for indexing services, managing
> web-addresses.
>
> I'd actually be particularly interested in paying the assistant EiCs (or
> creating non-editorial position like 'technical assistant') and defining
> specific tasks for them e.g.:
>
> - Contacting potential authors based on a list of topics and email
> addresses
> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-2jGMgF-16AgMAWnDxPG01PWDwX01BTj
> o_xfsHr-aAw/edit#gid=0> - Updating the tracking table
> <https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group/Potential_upcoming
> _articles>
> - Processing published articles (doi, add to page, etc)
> - Formatting published PDFs
>
>
> There is certainly precedent within WikiMedia projects for contributors
> with significant off-wiki responsibilities to be compensated. Even
> Wikimedia Australia chapter has a budget of 33k
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Simple/Applications/Wikimedia_Aust
> ralia/2018#Budget_and_resource_plan>. However we would no longer be able
> to use phrases like 'fully volunteer editorial board'.
>
> All the best,
> Thomas
>
>
>
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2018 at 21:57 Daniele Pugliesi
> <daniele.pugliesi@wikimedia.it>
> wrote:
>
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>> Regarding the proposal to pay editor and reviewers, I would be happy to
>>  be paid because at the moment I have a lot of other job to do and not
>> have so much time to dedicate to WIkiJournal of Science, but in case
>> this activity becomes a job, I would be very happy to spend more time
>> and efforts on it and less time on other jobs.
>>
>> Daniele Pugliesi
>>
>>
>>
>> Il 2018-08-11 22:45 Mikael Häggström ha scritto:
>>
>>> I have hence received one other disagreeing reply from a board
>>> member, but I assumed the result by agreeing by the points raised by
>>> ML.
>>> However, let's indeed wait for some further replies before concluding
>>> this.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>>
>>> Mikael
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 10:24 PM, Jackie Koerner
>>> <jackie.koerner@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Mikael,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Only one member of the Boards has thus far disagreed in this email
>>>> thread. Have there been others who have responded to you directly?
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jackie
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jackie Koerner, Ph.D.
>>>> Researcher & Visiting Scholar
>>>> jackiekoerner.com [1]
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 11, 2018, at 2:36 PM, Mikael Häggström
>>>> <editor.in.chief@wikijmed.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Very well, so it seems we won't add this to next year's grant
>>>> proposal. I'm still keeping it in mind as a last resort if the
>>>> administrative backlogs are further increasing, but I also hope
>>>> that the alternative of having a hired associate editor will
>>>> decrease the burden significantly anyways.
>>>>
>>>> I also forward a response from Diptanshu on this matter.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Mikael
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 4:49 PM, Dr. Diptanshu Das
>>>> <das.diptanshu@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mikael
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I strongly oppose your proposal of such a compensation. Thanks
>>>> Michael for already having put the salient points prior to me.
>>>> WikiJournal is not just another journal system the expenses of which
>>>>  are borne by Wikimedia Foundation. We are more. We are built on
>>>> the principles of Wikipedia. Those who do not have any association
>>>> with the free knowledge movement or who are not associated with such
>>>>  collaborative contribution would simply not understand this. Our
>>>> objective should be to attract candidates who are not familiar with
>>>>  the free knowledge movement. So, I assume that being a volunteer
>>>> is a pre-requisite. Michael is right in pointing out that if we
>>>> cannot make the project run on volunteers, perhaps we need to
>>>> reconsider the model.
>>>>
>>>> I need to mention that over the last several years the sister
>>>> project affiliation committee has not approved a single sister
>>>> project (barring Wikidata which was approved entirely on different
>>>> grounds) because the projects have not proved themselves fit to be
>>>> run by volunteers alone and that granting Wikiversity the status of
>>>>  sister project has been considered one of the biggest blunders of
>>>> the WMF.
>>>>
>>>> Please forward this email to the respective boards of which I am
>>>> not a member.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Diptanshu
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please do not print this e-mail unless you really need to.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 11 Aug 2018 at 13:22, Michaël Laurent
>>>> <michael.laurent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Personally I disagree. There are numerous projects within the
>>>> Wikimedia foundation and most of them rely on volunteers. If we
>>>> cannot expand it to a critical mass without throwing money at it
>>>> perhaps we should first reconsider the model.
>>>>
>>>> Again I propose to look at some of the Frontiers journals. They
>>>> have a huge board of reviewers facilitating peer review. Perhaps we
>>>> should invite more editors too.
>>>>
>>>> BW ML
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Op vr 10 aug. 2018 22:54 schreef Jackie Koerner
>>>> <jackie.koerner@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think this is a very reasonable proposal. I do think this should
>>>> be discussed annually in case we need to adjust to be a more
>>>> appropriate amount. This would be, say as workload and demands
>>>> increase, or as budget overall increases, the stipend might be
>>>> adjusted.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jackie
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jackie Koerner, Ph.D.
>>>> Researcher & Visiting Scholar
>>>> jackiekoerner.com [1]
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 10, 2018, at 3:19 PM, Mikael Häggström
>>>> <editor.in.chief@wikijmed.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hello again,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have informed the board at WikiJMed that I would prefer to see
>>>> someone with more time than me to be the editor-in-chief when my term
>>>> ends by New Year, and the Assistant editor-in-chief has expressed a
>>>> similar attitude to it. Yet, the only other candidate to the
>>>> editor-in-chief position has also expressed reluctance to it. For
>>>> the long term survival of the journals I think we need to add a
>>>> monetary compensation to editor-in-chiefs, and practically also to
>>>> add an incentive to apply to this position.
>>>>
>>>> I think an annual compensation of let's say $2000 for each
>>>> editor-in-chief and $1000 for each assistant would be a humble start
>>>>  as part of the grant application for next year, especially
>>>> considering that average salaries for editors-in-chief in the US
>>>> are about $85.000 (link [2]) and $57.000 for assistants (link) [3].
>>>> Also, it is very humble comparing to the generally $100.000+ that
>>>> many people make within Wikimedia Foundation (link [4]), and the
>>>> income of $91 million that Wikimedia Foundation received in 2017
>>>> (link) [5]. Thus, we can definitely adjust this amount further in
>>>> the future depending on the success of this grant application.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Mikael
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "WJH board" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>> send an email to wjhboard+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to
>>>> this group, send email to wjhboard@googlegroups.com. Visit this
>>>> group at https://groups.google.com/group/wjhboard [6]. To view this
>>>> discussion on the web, visit
>>>>
>>>
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wjhboard/CACubOwiRUpiFW7qQmnhoyF8PzvM
>> FOLWSeDuEjUNF3X1HrvcaGQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>
>>>> [7].
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout [8].
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "WJM board" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>> send an email to wjmboard+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to
>>>> this group, send email to wjmboard@googlegroups.com. Visit this
>>>> group at https://groups.google.com/group/wjmboard [9]. To view this
>>>> discussion on the web visit
>>>>
>>>
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wjmboard/1B0C88E5-4A35-4182-87FD-BF13
>> 2B4AFF79%40gmail.com
>>
>>>> [10].
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout [8].
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> WikiJournal-en mailing list
>>> WikiJournal-en@lists.wikimedia.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikijournal-en [11]
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "WJH board" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>  an email to wjhboard+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this
>>> group, send email to wjhboard@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at
>>> https://groups.google.com/group/wjhboard [6].
>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>>>
>>>
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wjhboard/CACubOwj5rVGjVeN%3DuNHt%2BNv
>> pMagFLmoOLUeh3ibOgdJ60kpCEA%40mail.gmail.com
>>> [12].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout [8].
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "WJS board" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>  an email to wjsboard+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this
>>> group, send email to wjsboard@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at
>>> https://groups.google.com/group/wjsboard.
>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>>>
>>>
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wjsboard/CACubOwhVVgZ-bB9T0Es%2BTzR-b
>> Uzxbffy%3D4QxwRrA9q86G2C74Q%40mail.gmail.com
>>
>>> [13].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Links:
>>> ------
>>> [1] http://jackiekoerner.com/
>>> [2]
>>>
>>>
>> https://www.glassdoor.com/Salaries/editor-in-chief-salary-SRCH_KO0,15.h
>> tm
>>> [3]
>>>
>>>
>> https://www.glassdoor.com/Salaries/assistant-to-the-editor-in-chief-sal
>> ary-SRCH_KO0,32.htm
>>> [4] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_salaries
>>> [5] https://annual.wikimedia.org/2017/financials.html
>>> [6] https://groups.google.com/group/wjhboard
>>> [7]
>>>
>>>
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wjhboard/CACubOwiRUpiFW7qQmnhoyF8PzvM
>> FOLWSeDuEjUNF3X1HrvcaGQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&amp;utm_sourc
>> e=footer
>>> [8] https://groups.google.com/d/optout
>>> [9] https://groups.google.com/group/wjmboard
>>> [10]
>>>
>>>
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wjmboard/1B0C88E5-4A35-4182-87FD-BF13
>> 2B4AFF79%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=footer
>>
>>> [11] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikijournal-en
>>> [12]
>>>
>>>
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wjhboard/CACubOwj5rVGjVeN%3DuNHt%2BNv
>> pMagFLmoOLUeh3ibOgdJ60kpCEA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&amp;utm_s
>> ource=footer
>>> [13]
>>>
>>>
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wjsboard/CACubOwhVVgZ-bB9T0Es%2BTzR-b
>> Uzxbffy%3D4QxwRrA9q86G2C74Q%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_sourc
>> e=footer
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups
>> "WJM board" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> an email to wjmboard+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group,
>> send email to wjmboard@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at
>> https://groups.google.com/group/wjmboard.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wjmboard/0ecff310e0321761b6e2fcf76c78a
>> 6a7%40wikimedia.it
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
> --
>
>
>
> *AgriBio* & *La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science* | Postdoctoral
> research fellow
>
> Profiles at ResearchGate
> <https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Thomas_Shafee> | LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/T-Shafee> | GScholar
> <scholar.google.co.uk/citations?hl=en&user=m6Qd3zIAAAAJ> | AltMetric
> <https://www.altmetric.com/explorer/report/e90b2068-8e9c-44e4-aa34-b998765
> e841e> | Wikipedia
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Evolution_and_evolvability>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "WJS board" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to wjsboard+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group,
> send an email to wjsboard@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at
> https://groups.google.com/group/wjsboard.
> To view this discussion on the web, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wjsboard/CAFikvs07UqJeC4ZkbZhOzrjAk7zGo
> Mxf7-Jizj0caM-trHCQFw%40mail.gmail.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>


Book: The English Love Affair with Nature, 2015
http://www.obsessedbynature.com

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WJS board" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to wjsboard+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to wjsboard@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/wjsboard.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wjsboard/25dcfdb17a7fa4391231ec2da3faca13.squirrel%40just115.justhost.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.