--- Daniel Mayer <maveric149(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
--- Rick <giantsrick13(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
I think we've discussed ad nauseum how people
are
afraid to request sanctions against other users
because of the perceived (and real) threat that the
arbcom will turn it against the person bringing the
case.
Name a case where that happened.
I should have added, name a case where that happened where the person bringing
the case was in fact innocent and then wrongfully sanctioned. It would be
absurd to only look at the accused and not the accuser. That would encourage
bad actors to request frivolous arbitrations.
-- mav
The ArbCom process should already be able to handle this. Let's look at
the process:
1. Conflict resolution fails
2. User requests ArbCom decision
3. ArbCom members vote on whether to accept the case
4. ArbCom procedes and looks into the matter at hand
At step 3 the user submitting the case should be examined. If its
determined that the user is requesting an Arbitration case in bad faith
the arbitrators reject the case. If the user continues to file frivilous
requests a seperate ArbCom request is submitted against that user and
they are stopped at the source.
This has already happened with CheeseDreams. It worked admirably.
TBSDY