Why might it not become as reliable as any other magazine discussing
media? It depends on the quality of the editing.
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Ken Arromdee<arromdee(a)rahul.net> wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009 WJhonson(a)aol.com wrote:
The reason for my objection, is that we, our
project, should not put
ourselves into a position where we are becoming the main source of financial
support for some newly-created effective auxiliary. I hope we can all see, how
some obscure online subscription mag like "Pokeman Today" would get a
tremendous boost just by being sourced to one of our articles.
It's pretty unlikely that anything like that would be considered a reliable
source.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l