-----Original Message-----
From: Gwern Branwen [mailto:gwern0@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2007 01:16 PM
To: 'English Wikipedia'
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] A much neglected aspect of quality - Bibliographies
What bothers me is the unclearness of the idea of a
'bibliography'. I've run into this in a number of my articles - in an article
about an author, say, does a Bibliography contain a comprehensive listing of his works, a
comprehensive listing of works about him and his work, a list like the previous but only
containing the ones you haven't yet used a references (I've compromised and
treated that kind of bibliography as a 'Further Reading' section thus far), or
what?
--
gwern
In the case of an author there might be "Works" "Fiction"
"Non-fiction" in addition to "Biographies" and "Literary
criticism"
There could be a "Notes" section for references used. "External links"
for cool web sites or articles available on line.
And a "Bibliography" containing recommended sources.
Fred