Of course getting broad community input is good. But I wish that you would participate in
the proposed mediation. IMO, achieving consensus WITH other interested parties is key to
solving the issues related to these articles.
My 2 cents worth.
Sydney Poore
Georgetown, KY
---- homey2005(a)sympatico.ca wrote:
At
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Central_discussions/Apartheid a series of competing
proposals have been made on how to deal with various articles on modern uses of the word
"apartheid", namely [[Israeli apartheid]], [[gender apartheid]], [[sexual
apartheid]], [[Crime of apartheid]] and [[global apartheid]] and also the articles
[[Apartheid outside of South Africa]] and [[Apartheid (disambiguation)]]. The proposals
vary from merging various articles (particularly Israeli apartheid) to leaving the
articles in their current state. The debate and voting has been dominated by various
interests - it would thus be best for the community if a broader cross section of people
including disinterested and neutral parties, reviewed the proposals and had their say.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l