In a message dated 6/18/2008 1:59:31 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
sam.blacketer(a)googlemail.com writes:
I think the greater danger would be the assumption that administrators are
bound to act irresponsibly. >>
--------------------------------------------
You set up a false dichotomy. It is not that we have a choice between "all
administrators act responsibly" and "all administrators are
irresponsibly".
That is not the situation. The true situation is that "some administrators
sometimes act irresponsibly."
To require a reversal of an arbitrary action *only* on the consensus of the
community essentially encourages some admins to act irresponsibly even more
often, because they know their actions will be even less often reviewed since
the procedure to so-do is now beauracratic. That is the wrong message to be
sending.
Will Johnson
**************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for
fuel-efficient used cars. (
http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)