(in reply to:)
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:17:11 +0000
From: <charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com>
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Systemic bias wrt gender
To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Message-ID:
<20061122161717.BHDZ1848.aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com(a)smtp.ntlworld.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
"David Gerard" wrote
Also, you know how any technical field laments
the strange lack of
women?
Not really the point, though. Wiki is not highly technical. The
social-interaction
part of WP is much more
demanding than remembering the mark-up.
I find it 'unfortunate', however that the recent writing contest seemed to
give gold, silver and bronze to
armchair warriors(see WP:SIGN). That really is a
Boy's Toys area. I have
to say that I gave up on Danny's
contests after seeing that soda-can stoves were more
valued than major
African poets.
Charles
Well I'm not sure how to respond to that exactly, other than to say that we
judged the entries that turned up based on the criteria we developed (which
were in turn based on the goals, to demonstrate referencability...) Those
entries were the best at it.
Not that it's relevant (so why did I mention it? Dunno) but of the three
judges that actively judged entries, I was the only boy.
Larry Pieniazek (User Lar)
Hobby mail: lar at
miltontrainworks.com