Anthony DiPierro wrote:
The edit I saw qualified a POV statement making it less
POV.
Original statement: Yet, President Reagan's tenure marked a time of
economic prosperity for the United States.
Modified statement: Yet, President Reagan's tenure marked a time of economic
prosperity for the United States, at least for the wealthy.
Both statements are POV.
It would have helped if James had quoted the above in his original
post. I have no problems admitting that my own sentiments are closer to
his POV, but this is not the place to solve the question of how those
events should be best interpreted.
The issue here has more to do with peremptory banning, and rudeness to
newbies. I don't know [[user:Oberiko]]. Perhaps someone should bring
him into the discussion. The person who nominated him to be a sysop
should know him well enough to discuss this matter with him.
Ec