actionforum(a)comcast.net wrote: To articles that have *no references whatsoever* and no external links and aren't stubs. i.e. not "your references are crap" but literally, "this article has no references at all." Now then, the question I asked before. You wrote: scientific article written by one of our inhouse experts that correctly states the basic concept of a scientific field, but in a way that hasn't been "published" because it is trivial grad student exercise the derive it, and all published work is at the bleeding edge of the field. Imagine his/her frustration at being asked for a citation for something that is obvious, and not being able to provide one, even though he can explain it so well that even the arbitrators understand it. hole in making the subject more accessible. I asked: Do you have real-life examples of this happening? - d.