--- Daniel Mayer <maveric149(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
LDan wrote:
What if the person doesn't check the page?
Why not just contact the author instead of a
boilerplate thing on the article, which, IMO, is
just as bad a defacement.
What? If the page is listable on VfD then at least
somebody thinks it has
serious issues. Therefore a notice that the page is
being considered for
deletion is valuable information for the reader of
the page.
We seem to not be understanding eachother at all. I
thought we were concerned about the author, not the
reader. And I'm not arguing against VfD.
Deleting a page really isn't as bad as
sending someone to prison.
Where oh where did I mention prison?
Arresting, going to court, whatever.
And no one's arguing that we should
make any deletion records private.
? And where did I say that they were? I specifically
mentioned that VfD is a
publicly viewable page and compared it with
publically viewable court
documents.
... implying that lack of a notice on that page would
make deletion records private.
-- mav
LDan
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com