Long Dong Silver is genuinely famous.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:35 PM, George Herbert
<george.herbert(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
Fred? Could you please explain why you suppressed the
revisions?
None of the criteria seems to apply.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Steve Summit <scs(a)eskimo.com> wrote:
It's still in Google's cache. It
doesn'tlook so very bad,
that I can see.
The last entry on the talk page indicates that the page was
deleted (and, yes, supporessed) by Fred at 00:41.
George Herbert wrote:
> Ok,
>
> A. The assertion that he fails PORNBIO seems rather flat on the face
> of it, based on my moderate familiarity with 70s/80s porn, and
>
> B. WTF happened with the article history? It seems to have been hard
> deleted rather than normal deleted. I can't even go back and check
> the version diffs to see what was actually there previously. I can't
> even tell who deleted the revs, as far as I can see.
>
> Bad, bad form.
>
>
> -george
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Phil Nash <phnash(a)blueyonder.co.uk>
wrote:
> > Fred Bauder wrote:
> >>> This article needs to be put out of its misery; it's been tagged
for
> >>> additional citations for 21 months, and still does not meet the
> >>> [[WP:PORNBIO]] criteria. It also appears to contain unsourced BLP
> >>> vandalism
> >>> (Liam McBride?) . All citations refer to one incident in which he
was
> >>> referred to in passing, which
does not confer notability. As for
"His
> >>> head
> >>> is also pictured in an episode of the show Futurama entitled "A
Head
> >>> in the
> >>> Polls.", as far as I am aware about this performer, his head is
the
> >>> least notable part of his anatomy.
> >>>
> >>> I'd do it myself, but.....
> >>>
> >>> Thanks.
> >>
> >> Seems like a close question to me, but I think Thomas was referring
to
> >> himself, not some obscure porn
star.
> >>
> >> Fred
> >
> > Even so, LDS fails [[WP:GNG]] per [[WP:ONEVENT]] on that basis, and
his
> > notability should be judged by
[[WP:PORNBIO]] and not otherwise, since
the
> > thrust (sorry!) of the article is that
he is notable as a porn star
and not
> > as a bit-player in the machinations of
US politics. The article, as it
> > stands, is a disgrace to Wikipedia's standards, if it still claims to
have
any.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
-george william herbert
george.herbert(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
-george william herbert
george.herbert(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l