2008/9/26 <WJhonson(a)aol.com>om>:
That's a very fine hair you're trying to split
here.
To justify the actions of one person, while vilifying the actions of
another, even though they did, exactly the same thing. No matter how thinly the
hair is split, it is the *intent* of the person which matters isn't it?
And we are all old enough to understand that "intent" can be viewed in a
hundred different ways depending on who you're trying to attack :)
Is this email in reply to me? Please quote emails when replying to
them otherwise it is almost impossible to follow a thread. Thank you.