Not much to see here, but for full disclosure, I am forwarding this last message from the
thread. All messages from committee members are entirely quoted in the 2 mails now
forwarded, except for 1 templated paragraph.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [arbcom-appeals-en] BASC status and transparency
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 18:35:42 -0400
From: Filipus Klutiero <chealer(a)gmail.com>
To: arbcom-appeals-en(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Hi LFaraone,
On 2015-05-18 17:14, LFaraone (BASC) wrote:
Chealer,
This confirms receipt of your message, the contents of which have been
distributed to members of the subcommittee.
Thank you
The purpose of this list
is to hear appeals of blocks and bans, not to submit bug reports or
suggest changes to Wikipedia policies or processes.
I am not sure what you mean. The mail I sent primarily meant to avoid misinterpretation of
my suggestion regarding BASC status, which is why I think it is relevant here, but feel
free to suggest a better forum if you consider this suboptimal (although I currently have
no intention to add anything).
As for the submission bug, I was not sending a proper bug report and just meant to let you
know there is a bug in case this has not been reported yet. If this is already tracked,
someone can point me to the ticket and I will contribute there if possible. If not, I
meant to signal my willingness to help if someone else is interested. This could be a
browser bug, but a Wikipedia bug seems much more likely. If someone volunteers, I use the
same address on XMPP.
-- LFaraone
[...]
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.com