This seems a minor dispute about how the article is to be organized. Lir
seems to want to provide an introductory summary at the beginning of the
article, but this is very much 172's article, he having written the bulk of
it. 172's attitude is not very good, but our practice has never been to ban
anyone for being mildly aggressive. Should 172 also request mediation,
perhaps that could happen.
Fred
From: A [name omitted for privacy reasons]
<wikilir(a)yahoo.com>
Reply-To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 19:10:18 -0800 (PST)
To: A [name omitted for privacy reasons] <wikilir(a)yahoo.com>om>,
wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org
Subject: [WikiEN-l] Request for Arbitration (or Mediation)
I believe numerous requests have been made for
mediation, at New Imperialism, over the past year.
?
I would like to request arbitration at [[New
Imperialism]], where 172 is reverting several
paragraphs I have added; on the grounds that "some" of
the information belongs "elsewhere".
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=New_Imperialism&diff=0&o…
33> 6
I think such reversions should be a bannable offence,
it is inappropriate to make mass reverts, simply
because you are aesthetically unhappy with a portion
of a user's edits.
I am trying to improve the Wiki, and my attempts are
constantly opposed by a small group of hostile users;
who make no attempt to collaborate, instead, they
attack and revert for any minor mistake. I expect the
arbitration committee to deal with this issue.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l