Karl A. Krueger wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 06:47:47PM -0800, Michael Snow
wrote:
>Karl A. Krueger wrote:
>>It seems to me it should be _standard
procedure_ that if the Arbitration
>>Committee accepts a case in which wrongdoing by an administrator is a
>>central issue, that the administrator step down (accept removal of
>>administrative powers) for the duration of the arbitration.
>I think the arbitrators are quite capable of
discerning in which cases
>emergency measures are necessary and issuing an appropriate temporary
>injunction.
Fair enough. I just wanted to put it on the table.
Call it a different approach to what it might mean to enjoy the trust of
the community whilst under review for possible betrayal of that trust.
For a practical example, consider the recent case of Everyking, who was
an admin. He came up before the AC and was duly restricted in his editing on
certain subjects. But he kept his ops before, during and after, and has them
now. Some people said they should be removed, but there was no evidence that
they had been abused, so there wasn't any reason to.
- d.