On 10/9/05, actionforum(a)comcast.net <actionforum(a)comcast.net > wrote:
I'd be more impressed if you could
get fair representation for anarcho-capitalism on the
anarchism
page,
Currently seems to have a pretty fair three-paragraph summary, and a link to
a full article on the subject.
or if you could get Castro properly labeled as a dictator.
The correct description is apparently "Presidente del Consejo de Estado" or
just "Presidente", or alternatively "Comandante en Jefe". Nobody seems
to be
able to get those titles into the article. Instead we have squabbling over
whether to call him a "ruler" or a "dictator". Edit warring does not
help
this, it makes it worse.
Now the late Shah of Iran has similar problems. Somebody keeps trying to run
off with "His Imperial Majesty " and "Aryamehr".
Or how about getting what everybody expects to be called
communism, the communist state, and criticisms of it
on
the communism page.
I'd expect a description of an ideology, and some general history, under an
-ism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism
For communist states we have an article with the completely unsurprising
title "Communist state".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_state
For the Communist International, there's an article called "Comintern".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comintern
Do you ever try the hard stuff on a page with a clique suppressing
other POVs?
There is a dispute resolution process for the serious stuff, you know.