I am simply worried about the ratio of featured articles to non-featured articles. As I
see it, FAs would be the first to go straight to Wikipedia 1.0, so why not produce more
high-quality articles?
--Ryan
From: Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net>
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Taking your eyes
off the ball
If you think they're too slow maybe you need to learn a little
patience. What's the rush?
Ec
Ryan W. (Merovingian) wrote:
> I can see that; it's not that I think the standards are too
> tough, more like the process is too slow.
>
>
>> From: geni <geniice(a)gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Taking your eyes off the
>> ball
>>
>> On 10/2/05, Ryan W. (Merovingian) <bigwiki(a)earthling.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Blargh, I don't know. I was talking more about AfD, though.
>>>
>>> Nevertheless, the FAC process needs to go faster. Look at last
>>> week: we gained four and >lost three FAs. That comes out to a
>>> total gain of one. This is unacceptable.
>>>
>>>
>> The standards for a FA are increaseing.
--
___________________________________________________________
Sign-up for Ads Free at
Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm