Sorry it was meant to be a joke. Obviously not very funny. :(
Christiaan
On Aug 17, 2004, at 4:09 am, jcecropia(a)mail.com wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: Christiaan Briggs <christiaan(a)yurkycross.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:49:09 +0100
To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] When can an article be considered public
domain?
On 14 Aug 2004, at 6:39 am, Jim Cecropia wrote:
First IANAL
Would such jargon stand up in a court of law?
Christiaan
In terms of what? I am not representing myself as a lawyer and thereby
stating that what I am saying may be knowledgeable, but it's not legal
advice, so take it FWIW. Anyone who went to court and said, "I did
this because a guy on the internet told me so" is not likely to do too
well anyway.
Even if I WERE a lawyer, I would still have to say it is not legal
advice, because no lawyer-client relationship exists.
IA-(still)-NAL, C