On 9/11/06, dmehkeri(a)swi.com <dmehkeri(a)swi.com> wrote:
Oh, and thanks to people claiming the "DRV
doesn't have a snowball's
chance in hell of being deleted" (despite the fact that several people
were strongly in favour)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion…
Damnit.
There ought to be a way to review inappropriate MfD closures like this.
Apart from DRV, right? The problem from what I see based on this discussion
is not with the fact that the DRV page actually exists, but how it's being
used. Ironically enough, the DRV page is supposed to be the place to discuss
inappropriate closures. The problem with DRV isn't that it exists, but
perhaps it is how it's being used and maybe (according to some) how it's
named. I sure hope it's not how it's named, because that would once again
smack of political correctness (it's already been renamed from VFU). IMHO,
it's not the name that's the main problem but how it's being used.