--- "Krzysztof P. Jasiutowicz"
<living_english_structure(a)go2.pl> wrote:
From [[Wikipedia:Always make articles as complete
as possible]]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
One of Wikipedia's [[wikipedia:Policies and
guidelines|rules to consider]]:
Whenever you write a page, always make it as
complete and comprehensive as
possible.
<br>Don't create an article until it is in form
ready for publication. If you feel that your
article is seriously incomplete and you are urged to
publish it please insert boilerplate text from
[[Wikipedia:Stub]] into the article.
This rule is meant to supersede [[Wikipedia:Always
leave something undone|
"Always leave something undone" rule]] that is
regarded obsolete.
This rule is open for debate.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Articles happen to be reviewed almost
instantaneously (as they appear on RC)
or they can stay unreviewed with embarrassing errors
for months (years?).
Cooperation and collective authorship that are
behind the
"Always leave something undone" rule were great in
the old days when there
were 50-100 edits daily not 3000+.
There's no guarantee that a proportion of articles
slip form the RC and
plunge into the Wikipedia's great information soup.
This is an observation from perusing the ancient
pages list.
Regards,
Kpjas.
I think both rules are horrible. Just do the best you
can do. If you make an obvious typo, someone might fix
it without doing anything else. And if you insist that
everything that is written must me
encyclopedia-quality, nothing will get done. I think
we should each write as much as possible in each
article, but not more than that.
-LDan
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com