(I'm cross-posting this to wikitech-l, please reply there) David Gerard wrote: I've brought this up before (at least a couple times), and this is the situation as I see it: * Windows users that have the font "Arial Unicode" installed can select that as their default font in IE to see the IPA symbols. I've tested this and it works. This also works for other fonts that have IPA symbols like Gentium and Code2000, although those fonts have to be downloaded and installed by the user. On pages that include IPA symbols, we might suggest that the users select "Arial Unicode" as their default font, or link to a page that suggests this. * If IPA symbols were surrounded by <span style="font-family:gentium, code2000, arial unicode, lucida grande"> tags, more people would be able to read them, as it will work on any recent Windows IE if they have one of those fonts installed, regardless of what their browser's default font setting is. However, despite my previous requests, the current MediaWiki software does not allow <span> tags. It is possible to use <font> tags to achieve the same results, but <font> tags have been deprecated from the HTML standard for nearly 8 years, and so should be avoided. * The LaTeX package TIPA supports IPA and could render the symbols much like the current <math> tags do, if such support were installed. Such renderings would be visible in any browser. * The WikiTeX system supports TIPA [http://wikisophia.org/wiki/Wikitex#Tipa], but isn't yet completed or supported on Wikipedia, although there is hope to do so. My recommended solution is: * Implement some kind of wiki markup for indicating IPA text in the wiki source, ideally as part of the WikiTeX system. * Mark up all IPA symbols on Wikipedia using the markup! * Logged-in users can set their preference to Unicode IPA, WikiTeX TIPA images, and/or (X-)SAMPA. * This system would put <span style="font-family:..."> tags around Unicode IPA in the HTML output so Windows IE users who have set their preference to Unicode will be able to see the symbols regardless of their browser's font setting. The following items also have to be considered * What do do for anonymous users: should we do a browser detect and serve a page with unicode IPA or WikiTeX-ed image of the IPA, depending on the browser, or just send WikiTeX images to all anonymous users? It is hard to guarantee via a browser detect that the user has the proper unicode fonts, although certainly for all Safari users, the Unicode will render correctly, because Mac OS X has fonts with unicode characters installed by default. We need to do a browser/platform survey to determine what combinations are likely to support Unicode IPA. * What format to use for the input? **Unicode is a standard method of representing IPA symbols, but can be tricky to edit, and UTF-8 isn't supported on the English Wikipedia so it would have to be entered as entities. **The TIPA input method isn't standard, and for some rare characters is (IMHO unnecessarily) verbose, but it supports a wider range of characters than Unicode, and is ASCII compatible. **SAMPA or X-SAMPA is more of a standard than TIPA, and is also ASCII compatible, so it might be the best solution. **The International Phonetic Association has specified a set of 3-digit numbers for every symbol in the International Phonetic Alphabet, which is specified in Appendix 2 of the Handbook of the International Phonetic Association, so this is a standard endorsed by the creators of the IPA, but it's not particularly accessible, as I haven't seen a listing of IPA numbers on the web anywhere. One might be tempted to just use TIPA TeX rendering for IPA symbols, thereby reducing the complexity and the amount of development required, but there are several disadvantages to this method: * TeX renderings don't look good when printed, as they are rendered at 72 dpi. * TeX renderings can't be enlarged by changing the font size, something people with poor vision or low quality displays often do, and would be especially helpful for unfamiliar symbols like IPA symbols. * Inline TeX renderings won't be in the same font and may not be properly aligned with the surrounding text, and so may not be attractive. Therefore, where it is possible to use Unicode IPA, we should. Whatever method is chosen, at least one translator will have to be created to convert from one input method to another. I've already created such a system using lex to convert SAMPA input to HTML entities of Unicode symbols, so I can attest that it's not particularly difficult, although it's a bit tedious. Last, although pronunciations are somewhat rare on Wikipedia, there are some pages that rely on them, like [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_words_of_disputed_pronunciation]. Nevertheless, good support for IPA symbols would be a valuable component of MediaWiki, as it obviously would be widely used on Wiktionary. - David