On 02/03/2008, WJhonson(a)aol.com <WJhonson(a)aol.com> wrote:
In a message dated 3/2/2008 12:56:08 P.M. Pacific
Standard Time,
dgerard(a)gmail.com writes:
> I'd call that one immediatism vs
eventualism. The lack of an image, or
> the presence of a placeholder, reminds people that Wikipedia remains a
> work in progress. And placeholders do score us new free content.>>
A position against which I've never argued, by
the way.
But what we're discussing here is actually not this, but rather, the removal
of images where we do not have any replacement.
I see what you mean. However, such images lose to the Foundation content policy.
- d.