I should point out that this is the second day in a row Anthony has pulled a stunt like this. Yesterday, when Jim Henson was featured with a fair use picture, he removed the picture (causing a revert war betwene him and several others) and then when the page was protected (by me) he uploaded a blank image to replace it. When people reverted that, he got into a revert war on the image page. Like today, all this edit warring was visible on the main page. Anthony is doing this just because he can, because Wikipedia has no guidelines against users who are out to disrupt things. Futhermore, I don't particularly like the suggestion that his actions motivated policy. As I said on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Feature : "I've opposed previous proposals for voting on stuff because it would add a helleva lot of work to the process (as people above have said). The reason I support this is because it contains no voting. As a result, unlike all previous proposals, it seems like it might actually reduce the work and the bickering. If this had been brough up before Anthony's vandalism spree, I would have supported it just the same. Raul654 22:23, Jul 20, 2004 (UTC) --Mark