You are being accused of trying to get around the 3RR.
"Sam Spade has broken the 3 revert rule for the Atheism article a
number of times now. He insists on capitalizing all instances of "god"
against all consensus. For the last 2.5 days now Sam repeatedly
replaces any subsitute phrases (diety/dieties) entered in the article
as attempts to compromise. He thinks that by re-editing the phrases he
finds offensive and not actually reverting, he is able to side-step
the 2/3rr at the Atheism article"
From where I am standing it does look as if you were
guilty of doing this.
Theresa
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 07:01:25 -0500 (EST), Jack Lynch
<jacklynch(a)excite.com> wrote:
WP:AN#Accusation_of_breaking_the_revert_rule_against_Sam_Spade
I did not revert three times. Indeed, I was quite careful not to.
Please look into this matter.
Thank you
_______________________________________________
Join Excite! -
http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l