Offensive content - WikiEN-l - lists.wikimedia.org

List overview All Threads
Download

Offensive content

Re: Top posting

Re: We should not not abide by...

Anthere

16 Feb 2005 16 Feb '05

6:24 p.m.

Though I have seen similar discussions on the topic for more than three years now, and expect no consensus anytime soon, I propose those interested to read http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Offensive_content And possibly comment Or come with new ideas. Thanks Anthere

Reply

Show replies by date

Sj

16 Feb 16 Feb

11:22 p.m.

See for instance: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Offensive_content/sj-proposal I think getting people to agree on npov information about pages and media, and giving them options re: what to see, is an obvious win. The default settings for anonymous users should be less in-your-face about violence and sex than the settings for users who want everything included in article pages. SJ On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 19:24:59 +0100, Anthere <anthere9(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

Though I have seen similar discussions on the topic for more than three years now, and expect no consensus anytime soon, I propose those interested to read http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Offensive_content And possibly comment Or come with new ideas. Thanks Anthere _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

-- +sj+ _ _ :-------.-.--------.--.--------.-.--------.--.--------[...]

Reply

Anthere

17 Feb 17 Feb

5:24 a.m.

Actually, I would rather say that the default version should include everything. Editors would have to log and specifically ask for a certain censorship for it to happen. This would be a delibarate choice, and people could know that by default, everything is there. The identification of various level of offensiveness or classes of offensiveness could be managed thanks to categories. Ant Sj a écrit:

See for instance: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Offensive_content/sj-proposal I think getting people to agree on npov information about pages and media, and giving them options re: what to see, is an obvious win. The default settings for anonymous users should be less in-your-face about violence and sex than the settings for users who want everything included in article pages. SJ On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 19:24:59 +0100, Anthere <anthere9(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

Though I have seen similar discussions on the topic for more than three years now, and expect no consensus anytime soon, I propose those interested to read http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Offensive_content And possibly comment Or come with new ideas. Thanks Anthere _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Reply

7037

days inactive

7038

days old

wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org

Manage subscription

2 comments

2 participants

tags (0)

participants (2)

Anthere
Sj