Stevertigo wrote:
Tim: Next time, (since you seem to be the dev'r
taking
point with namechanges) you might wait a minute and
see if a target name for a change is problematic. I
dont have any problem with it, per se-- but
considering the objections raised onlist, and that its
in fact just a hack of Jesus is Lord (sans ! ) -- I
suggest that the final decision of making a change and
what the change is-- might also better be in the hands
of the collective, as well.
And I just want to say that you did a fine job Tim, all round.
PS: Yes, ATC, it would be silly to start a
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Drolsi_Susej/namechange
page now. (Maybe)
Kudos also to the Wikipedia Borg for deciding that,
while "Drolsi Susej" is problematic (and I believe it is!),
it is nevertheless acceptable (for now maybe).
-- Toby