--- Alex Tievsky <atievsky(a)cox.net> wrote:
======= At 2003-09-07, 19:00:00 Daniel Ehrenberg
wrote: =======
I also don't think that anons should be
treated
differently than other non-sysop users, this is
just
discriminating against them.
LDan
Is such discrimination prevelant? The only
distinction I make between the two "classes" is that
an uncommented change from an anon user on Recent
Changes is the most likely type to be an act of
vandalism. Otherwise, I don't go about reverting
changes from anon users or anything of the type. I
also don't see any real opportunity to
"discriminate" against an anon user since such a
user doesn't have a static talk page, probably
doesn't belong to a mailing list and probably
doesn't post much in the way of discussion.
-Alex Tievsky
www.wikipedia.org/wiki/user:Basil Fawlty
There are many very good anon contributers who simply
wish to be anonymous. If you look at the Most Active
Wikipedians page, it shows around four anon
contributors. And that's just the ones with static
IPs.
LDan
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com