I agree, and am a little disturbed by a couple of
recent bans I have seen.
There may be good cause for them, but no explanation
has been given to users who have asked for it. I think
blocks and bans should be based solely on behavior
(except in cases of obscene, blasphemous or personal
attack names) and that there should be a forum where
users can ask for explanations of bans and blocks and
expect a reasonable response (ie more than 'Good - I
hope you get banned too).
Mark
--- Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
Charles Matthews wrote:
"Ray Saintonge" wrote
>It's not about "troll-culture"; (whatever that
is); it's
about the right
>to choose a name. The poisoned atmosphere
comes
the self-righteous
>crowd that goes around making all these petty
complaints.
If you don't _know_ troll-culture, that would be a
bit of a
disqualification?
No right to choose an in-your-face-name. What has
that to do with writing
an encyclopedia?
That last point is the important one. If someone
chooses an
in-your-face name I am not likely to complain about
the name, but I
admit that I will look at his edits more critically
than if he had
chosen something less controversial. If his edits
are consistently fair
and satisfactory I will eventually ignore the name,
and no-one will have
noticed how much scrutiny I have applied to those
edits.
Ec
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs