Yup, Japanese joinery, the works.
Christiaan
On 18 Jan 2005, at 1:42 am, cookiecaper wrote:
So, architecture? Other things too (i.e. small-scale
carpentry)?
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:50:18 +0000, Christiaan Briggs
<christiaan(a)last-straw.net> wrote:
> Wikibuilder - a knowledge base covering the design and construction of
> the built environment, in its entirety, in all languages.
>
> Project proposal page:
>
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikibuilder
>
> See also:
>
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_new_projects
>
> == Basic idea ==
>
> To create a knowledge base covering the design and construction of the
> built environment, in its entirety, in all languages.
>
> == Scope ==
>
> Much, if not most, of the information could be presented as text (and
> could start off as just that), but text presents profound and obvious
> limits for describing the built environment, so much of the
> information
> would be pictorial. With the drawing expertise of designers and
> draughtspeople around the world who are intimate with CAD (computer
> aided draughting) there should be no shortage of people to get the
> ball
> rolling.
>
> There are currently efforts going on in the graphics and architecture
> industries to standardise pictorial file formats (see links below) and
> the main topic of initial discussion on Wikibuilder may well revolve
> around the kind of file formats to use for presenting and distributing
> sketch, 2D, 3D and other kinds of pictorial information. Carrying on
> from this might be discussion on graphical styles and style
> standardisation.
>
> There are a few open-content repository-type websites around for
> sharing building details, et cetera, but most of them are woeful and
> narrowly focused on CAD technicians looking for details to use at
> work.
> There're a myriad of websites dotted around the internet offering
> information on design but this is extremely fragmented.
>
> == Why? ==
>
> Ever since we as a species started manipulating our environment we
> have
> built a vast knowledge of designing and constructing the built
> environment. This knowledge belongs to everyone, but much of it is is
> locked away in people's heads with no easy way to share such
> information except for books (usually expensive ones) and
> apprenticeship. A wiki focused on the built environment could help
> unlock this knowledge and make it accessible to vast numbers of people
> (builders, designers, inventors, diy'ers, knowledge lovers) who could
> put it to use and continue to build on it in a open way. A wiki could
> also help the push for open standards in the presentation of pictorial
> information via the internet.
>
> Kind regards,
> Christiaan