On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, Dante Alighieri wrote:
Just in case any of you out there think that Michael
is "misunderstood"
or reformed or just not getting a fair shake, I'd like to inform you all
that Michael has started his death threats again.
Interesting edit summaries he writes! But just as a note of pedantry,
telling someone to die is not a threat, but a command...
But seriously, is this really a productive use of anyone's time:
http://www.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Taang%21_Records&action=his…
?
To revert one of Michael's edits when you *know* that he's just going to
revert it straight back again is an exercise in futility. Can anyone put
forward any cogent argument for doing something that you know perfectly
well will be undone as soon as you've done it?
Why not do the following:
1. Leave notes on the developers' talk pages, asking if they could block
whatever user account he is then using;
2. Wait until that has been done;
3. Go to his user contributions page and revert all his edits in one fell
swoop?
That would save a lot of time.
Oliver
+-------------------------------------------+
| Oliver Pereira |
| Dept. of Electronics and Computer Science |
| University of Southampton |
| omp199(a)ecs.soton.ac.uk |
+-------------------------------------------+