I have been in dispute for some time with a small group of editors promoting the concept of personal rapid transit (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_rapid_transit), a proposed for of rapid transit. The major problem is that the article describes the features of a wide-scale implementation, but the few pilot projects have been on a much smaller scale and exhibit few of the features promoted as inherent by PRT proponents (such as very short headways, in the sub-second range and very large numbers of cars, to make waiting times short). We've succeeded in pruning most of the hyperbole from the PRT article, but there is a particular concept version, UniModal, which was redirected once per AfD and DRV (despite massive involvement from new and anonymous editors, if you get my drift) but which User:Fresheneesz in particular is keen to have. It has reappeared again at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UniModal, replete with claims of massive top speeds, fantastically low build and operating costs etc. I have pruned it down to a couple of verifiable paragraphs, but I just know that the usual war is going to result. I am always open to the possibility I may be wrong. It may be that we *like* to have large articles on hypothetical concepts for which the originators are vigorously pitching for funding. On the other hand, we might not. My reading of [[WP:V]] says not. But I'd appreciate another set of eyes. Fresheneesz's version is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=UniModal&oldid=57664644 Guy (JzG) -- http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG