Tom Haws wrote: We don't want forks. But our READERS often want a subset of our material. We established our web sites and our community to provide reliable FREE material for everyone in the world. (Remember, the choice of Wiki software was only a means to an end; a means that has served us amazingly well, but only a means: not the end itself.) Our web sites will ALWAYS contain the full set of articles. So the articles on diverse sexual practices (copiously illustrated) will forever be safe from censorship. But not all our readers want to see the full set. They'll settle for the 99.9% that helps them fulfill their goals. Poor schools in Africa: MUST they agree to accept articles about (largely Western) notions like [[autofellatio]] (with helpful images showing you how to try this yourself)? Did we create Wikipedia, only on the CONDITION that everyone who uses it read (or at least receive) every article we write? There's a web site that copies all our geographical articles. Call it "censorship" or "editorial decisions", if those terms motivate you, but from Uncle Ed's POV they are merely CHOOSING what is important to them and disregarding the rest. I'm sure somebody will decide to choose ONLY the sexological articles for a free Encyclopedia of Sex. I bet NOBODY at Wikipedia will accuse them of "censorship" for leaving out global warming or tsunami relief. They wouldn't think of it; they'd be gushing about intellectual freedom and so on. THEREFORE, I propose that we adopt as quickly as possible a system that lets readers and/or publishers easily identify articles that they want to include or exclude. I know Magnus has done a lot of work on this, and I hope he will continue. Wouldn't it be nice to have a category page that lists "all sex-related topics" or "all articles chosen for WikiDVD 1.0" or "articles selected by the GeoWorld project"? Imagine a poor country with a non-democratic government. They want to educate their people, but they are unwilling to tolerate some small number of ideas. Should we make it DIFFICULT or EASY for them to select a subset of articles for an Encyclopedia of Lessitania? Ed Poor, aka Uncle Ed