Fred Bauder wrote:
> Actually I have said so. Folks who declare an intent to be disruptive will
> reliably go on to be disruptive and damage will occur. There is no real need
> to wait while they do their thing.
O.k., well I had a different meaning in mind for "without a hearing". A temporary
ban on someone who is being disruptive should be followed by some kind of formal
hearing.
If I understood Nick correctly, he was raising the absurd strawman
argument that there is no middle ground between letting trolls do as
they please versus just getting rid of due process altogether.Not true jimbo, all I want is some due process, I understand that this is private project, and that we are building an ecyclopedia so our standrands are different from Government, or publicly help Corps.
Maybe
I misunderstood him, but he is a self-described troll out to disrupt
the site, so I think it's pretty safe to assume that he's going to
accuse people of things that they never advocated.I told you before jimbo I suffer from [[Bi-Poler Disorder]] (not an appeal to pity, sometimes I seriously am a different person w/o my Prozac). I do engage (at times) what might be considered bad behaveior but it's because I haven't taken my medicine. Jimbo I don't want to bother anyone, but my bad side tells me to "Troll, Troll, Troll, Keep the red faction page F--k with them!!" I understand Rick's and your opinion's, and I am seeing a shink so I will improve! :)
I remember when he was telling people in IRC that I had decided to
leave the project, for example.I seriously thought you where leaving because I misread an e-mail, actually I wouldn't like it if you left.
--Jimbo
I really wish to thank everyone who has been kind to me on this site, becuase my bad side has been getting weaker thanks to you!
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l