I think I've demonstrated quite clearly to all that I wish to continue and am capable of and more than willing to engage in improving wikipedia for the betterment of us all. Yes, we are all volunteers, and what we are volunteering is our effort to make this a great project for one man who is now paying us for that work by allowing us to stay here.
Codie Vickers
Look at all the busy little beavers watching this "case", who are now merrily improving wikipedia by expanding and glorifying my contributions. I want to thank all concerned for showing such faith in my tedious contributions that you wish to add to them and make them even better. It speaks volumes of the confidence in me which you display so openly.
Codie Vickers
Troll mafia is the idea that trolls may evolve a system of cooperation for more effective trolling. Through division of labor, these metatrolls are able to efficiently engage in harassment of other users while giving the appearance of due process. Troll mafia are thought to exploit the [[delphi technique of consenus building]], whereby they begin with a foregone conclusion, then politely ridicule any other suggestions until somebody proposes the solution they desire.
By the way, there is also no entry for delphi technique of consenus building entry in wikipedia. No delphi technique and no open source journalism. hmm Why is that?
Codie Vickers
These entries were also initiated by Plautus satire, and remain largely
unmolested by troubled people such as Curps.
Open source journalism
Phytochemicals
What's this? An entry for open source journalism did not exist before Plautus
satire entered it? Why has it remained? Plautus satire cites Slashdot and an
obscure periodical only, yet this entry remains unchallenged.
Who will be the first to step up and call open source journalism one of
Plautus satire's "conspiracy theories"?
Codie Vickers
I apologize for the terrible formatting of my last post, but as you can see I posted the entirety of my changes, anyone can view them and judge for themselves who is being fair and who is being unfair. I tried to add summaries that would give relevant context to the changes I made in every case. And I took a lot of abuse during this process.
Codie Vickers
You accuse me of spamming the email list? You posted to the list and left 43 lines of footer and 119 other lines of extraneous quoted text therein. Look at the mote in thine own eye.
delirium at rufus.d2g.com posted the following to this list:
***BEGIN QUOTE***
Rick wrote:
> So where is the Wikipedia jail? Right now, the accuseds are allowed
> to continue what they were doing, willy-nilly.
To summarize the matters currently under consideration:
* Plautus Satire is currently temp-banned for a week pending a decision
in his case, as Jimbo did so, and there was significant consensus that
this should be done.
***END QUOTE***
My case? The only case I'm involved in that has reached mediation is my
case against Curps. Curps has been harassing me and I have largely been
trying to work around it, but it became to cumbersome so I sought
assistance.
Curps is the defendant, I am the claimant.
Why is the process being ignored here?
Nobody has contacted me regarding anyone else's requests for mediation.
Why is the process being ignored here?
Curps announced his intention in the request I initiated involving his abuse.
The first version was titled "3 Curps v. Plautus satire"
The text follows:
***BEGIN QUOTE***
Curps v. Plautus satire
I would like to request some outside intervention for a situation that has
arisen. The user Curps seems intent on reversioning every edit I make,
without explanation in the summaries or on talk pages. I've made several
changes to entries recently, and all of them seem to have been reverted by
Curps, so either he is watching the same pages I am, or watching my
contributions, and reversioning them without explanation. I would like for
somebody to epxlain to Curps that he needs to discuss reversions,
especially if he is going around unmaking everything one user (me) does. -
Plautus satire 01:32, 21 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Curps reversions of Plautus satire as shown by page histories:[2][3][4][5]
[6][7]
***END QUOTE***
I am reluctant to disclose the details of my attempts to get mediation with
respect to Curps' abuse, because the other participants have demanded they
remain secret.
Codie Vickers
The following entries in wikipedia are there because I put them there, and
they remain largely intact. The talk page histories of many of these pages
show my collaborative efforts in bringing them up to snuff from my original
small entries.
Aquaponics
Dark compact
Garden cress
Laser broom
Laser star hypothesis
Watercress
This list may not be comprehensive.
Codie Vickers
(P.S.: In case I forgot to post the link to the page history for my original request for mediation in the matter of Curps' admitted abuse, here it is: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation… )
Arno M wrote:
> When will something be done?
Brian Corr wrote:
> Could someone give an update on a timeline for action?
Something will be done about Plautus when you do something about
Plautus. The timeline for action on Plautus is roughly:
1) You decide to act.
2) You act.
Perhaps you meant to ask a different question?
-Martin