For many surnames there are list articles or disambiguation items that can
be used as the target for this property
but not, I think, in this case.
Joe
On 3 Nov 2014 17:04, "Daniel Kinzler" <daniel.kinzler(a)wikimedia.de>
wrote:
Am 03.11.2014 17:31, schrieb Lydia Pintscher:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Jean-Baptiste
Pressac
<Jean-Baptiste.Pressac(a)univ-brest.fr> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Claims with surname properties are sometimes impossible. For instance,
I tried
to add the surname of René Grivart, but as I typed "Grivart" in the
property value, the "save" link stays unclickable. Should we systematically
create an item associated with the surname ?
That's how the community set it up, yes. The property has type item.
This means it can only link to existing items.
I think the idea is to use this property only if the surename itself is of
interested, and thus has a data item. The same is true for the
corresponding
"given name" property. In many instances, this would not be the case.
Having a separate field for the surname in general doesn't seem to useful
to me,
and could even be misleading. The concept of a "surname" as such is a
western
concept, and doesn't translate well to other culures. In fact, there isn't
much
we can assume about names at all, see
http://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-na…
Generally, there's just "the name", which would be given as the item's
label (or
an alias). IF that isn't sufficient, perhaps P1448 ("official name") could
be
used: that's a (monolingual) text property.
--
Daniel Kinzler
Senior Software Developer
Wikimedia Deutschland
Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l